Language and Thought

We can’t talk about language without considering its impact on thought. Because the question of whether and how much language influences thought (and vice versa) is complex and the subject of a lot of debate.

Does Language Influence Thought?

Interesting questions: Does one’s language shape the way one thinks? Does it shape the way one perceives the world? Do bilingual individuals think differently, or experience the world differently when shifting between languages? How much of this is driven by biology, by culture, by identity, and by experience?

Many people are sympathetic to the idea that language influences cognition to some degree, but demand evidence. Recently, experimental evidence has been accumulating that language can indeed shape certain aspects of thought and perception.

The Theoretical Landscape

Let’s get some background first.

Concepts

What do we mean by a concept stored in the brain?

TODO

Minds and Brains

TODO

Linguistic Relativity

Linguistic relativity asserts that language influences worldview or cognition. You’ll sometimes hear it called “The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis” of which there are two main versions:

Strong: Linguistic Determinism

Language determines thought — we cannot think what we cannot say. Now largely discredited.

Weak: Linguistic Relativity

Language influences habitual thought. Now has empirical support.

The Wikipedia page on linguistic relativity provides a good overview.

Influences of Language on Cognition

There are a few interesting examples of how language can (or may) shape thought:

Space and Time

English and other languages are egocentric: the terms left, right, front, back are relative to speaker. But in Guugu Yimithirr direction is absolute: things are north, south, east, west, always, even indoors, even in the dark.

Gender

...

Number

Pirahã may not have exact numbers beyond one, two, few, many. But they get along fine without number words.

Emotion

...

Locomotion

...

Color

...

Inner Speech

We often think in language, but not always. Visual-spatial reasoning, musical thought, mathematical intuition are not obviously linguistic. Language may be a formatting layer that makes thoughts communicable and memorable, not the medium of thought itself.

Immediacy of Experience

The Pirahã, and their immediacy of experience, again:

Joint Attention

Before you can teach a word, both parties must be attending to the same thing. Infants develop a (proto-linguistic) joint attention at ~9 months. Without joint attention, ostensive definition (“that’s a dog”) doesn’t work.

Exercise: Do you think this means that language requires social infrastructure and cannot be described as a form of information encoding?

Pointing is surprisingly rare in non-human primates.

Metaphor

TODO

Recall Practice

Here are some questions useful for your spaced repetition learning. Many of the answers are not found on this page. Some will have popped up in lecture. Others will require you to do your own research.

TODO

Summary

We’ve covered:

  • TODO
  • TODO